So there have been multiple controversies about the skinny model scandal. Why does the industry use mostly, if not only, models that seem to be underweight? Why not add a few regular sized models?
Smaller models are ideal because clothes tend to look better. If a plus-sized model were to model couture clothing, the designers and stylists would have to be selective in the clothing. For example, if Jane had a more full chest, that marigold ruffle shirt would get put aside since ruffles have a tendency to add volume to a larger bust. So a designer would need Jill to come in to work since her chest is smaller and it would fit more nicely. Jill is more likely to also have few curves which means most types of clothing would fit better since curves can be created (i.e. belted shirts).
The goal of becoming a fashion designer is to have the world view your creative mind and also to get money. They decide what fabrics they need. Some of these particular fabrics are quite expensive given the quantity needed. Having a size 2 model means using less fabric and therefore, accumulating more money.
Of course it gives off negative vibes to our young teenaged youth. Teens want to be what they see especially in the stages of finding themselves. But contrary to popular belief, most models eat hamburgers and fries. Incorporating a mix between normal and smaller models would be ideal. Costly, but ideal to save that one girl in your class that was hospitalized for battling bulimia.
This situation is so controversial that people tend to overlook the pros of having a smaller model. Given, models should in no way be underweight especially if they will be in the eyes of a younger crowd. However 1 in 3 children are obese (tripled since 1963) so it doesn't seem to be affecting them too much.
(Pictures: http://omgeemag.onsugar.com/tag/size and http://petitebrigitte.com/2007/02/21/skinny-models-debate-continues-as-pret-a-porter-looms/)
No comments:
Post a Comment